The Haitian government has the most realistic opportunity to safety and prosperity to the people of Haiti in decades, if not longer. Unfortunately, in the wake of the devastating earthquake, the government remains in need of substantial, proven assistance to build capacity and improve social, education, health, legal, and financial institutions.
As often seen in large scale disaster environments, there is a sizable gap between pledge announcements and the disbursement of funds. Currently, direct NGO funds are responsible for much of the health reconstruction efforts. Although NGO assistance has been critical in the disaster aftermath, this assistance has also historically led to an imbalance in the economy and shift more local resources and attention to aid organizations.
This continued imbalance will certainly hamper the “Build Back Better” vision and could result in more inefficiency.
Post Disaster public health reconstruction (especially with the expectation of a large influx of $ $ $ ) can greatly benefit from the input, feedback, and partnership of experienced hospital management, construction, and consulting communities.
The Haitian government should recognize the ability of the private sector to finance, design, build, and operate holistic reconstruction health projects for long term growth and sustainability.
When discussing the Public Private Partnership model for development I am often reminded of a story from my mother’s childhood.
My mother grew up in Port of Spain, Trinidad and attended St. Joseph’s Convent for her primary and secondary education. Her older brother would often pick her up after school. Following a particularly long day at school and with a heavy school bag slung over his shoulder, he left his school, Saint Mary’s College, to go pick up his younger sister.
He had a few minutes before her school let out and a bit of money in his pocket so along the way he stopped and bought a small bag of tamarind balls (bite sized sweets) from a little shop.
After buying the sweets he reached the school, took out his book and sat on a bench next to an elderly man.
A few minutes pasted and my uncle, fully absorbed in his book, took a tamarind ball from the bag and nibbled at it while he read.
To his surprise, the elderly gentleman next to him calmly took one of the tamarind balls from the bag and ate it. Stunned by the blatant theft, my uncle couldn’t bring himself to say anything, or even to look at the man. He simply kept reading.
After a few minutes he slowly picked up and ate another tamarind ball. Incredibly, the old man, too, took a tamarind ball and ate it, then to my uncle’s amazement; the old man lifted the bag and offered my uncle the last tamarind ball.
This being too much to tolerate, my uncle quickly grabbed his school bag, gave the old man an angry look and marched off to sit under a tree. Still flustered and enraged, he reached to put his book back inside his school bag only to find his bag of tamarind balls.
Opponents of public-private partnerships are often quick to mislabel PPP projects as the theft or pillaging of the public sector where “sneaky” corporate entities are more interested in profit maximization rather than the provision of healthcare.
In reality, PPPs require the continual participation of both stakeholders – the public and private. In contrast to privatization, properly structured hospital PPPs exist in clearly defined domains that represents neither the privatization nor the nationalization of assets and services.
Reconstructing the Haitian public health infrastructure through Public Private Partnerships can help develop, sustain, and expand the social and economic growth of the nation. This is of critical importance as the Interim Haitian Recovery Commission (IHRC) and the Haitian Reconstruction Fund struggle with financial realities of rebuilding the nation.
Since the early 1990s, many EU countries have used various forms of public-private partnership to deliver major construction and healthcare projects that were designed to deliver better quality public services, by bringing in new investment and improved management. In turn, this has helped state-owned businesses achieve their full potential.
By establishing mechanisms to include health PPPs, the Haitian government can access private finance to build health infrastructure while also enabling the government to transfer risks associated with clinical services to an experienced private sector partner.
Additionally, rather than paying for an asset or service up front, a PPP program will allow Haiti to pay for infrastructure and services over time based on predetermined performance standards determined by Haitian Health Regulatory Authorities.
By entering into a PPP agreement, the Haitian government incurs little or no costs during the construction of the medical facilities and if the private sector partner doesn’t deliver the facilities (on schedule) or fails to perform (as agreed), the government doesn’t pay, pays less, or applies financial penalties.
For a successful Hospital PPP to be implemented in Haiti, certain conditions have to be met:
1. The Haitian Government Authority and the private sector partner need to work together on the basis of clear, contractual agreements;
2. distinct regulations need to be laid down in those agreements concerning the responsibilities of the parties regarding costs and risks;
3. timely social and commercial goals have to be met at all times;
4. every party should keep its own identity and responsibilities.
Health infrastructure require massive amounts of investment, expertise and organizational knowledge – these are some of the resources or ‘capital’ that the private sector can bring to a public private partnership.
In addition to elevating the Haitian public health system, the government will experience substantial benefits from the transfers of technology, employment benefits, capacity building, and citizen betterment.
There are, however, operational, political, social, economic and financial risks for the Haitian government and its private sector partner.
Because PPP’s involve significant levels of capital investment with payback periods covering many years or decades, private companies often seek high levels of financing from international financial institutions, national development banks, and commercial banks, backed in many cases by government guarantees.
To achieve PPP project success, the Haitian government will need to ensure:
1. a political, legal and administrative framework that permits and facilitates private sector development and public private partnerships
2. the availability of necessary economic, financial, technical, institutional and negotiation expertise
3. and mechanisms for interagency cooperation and dispute resolution
Given Haiti’s tumultuous past and since many PPP projects span 20-30 years, a major concern for the private partner is how to ensure that there is real and perceived continuity and consistency in: the Haitian public health vision and in the laws and regulations over the long term despite changes that may occur in political regime.
There will be changes that happen during the span of a hospital PPP project. Some of these are not related or only indirectly related to the PPP. However citizen attitudes towards the public health system and the PPP projects can have a substantial influence on the success or failure of a PPP project.
This is where we see the great importance of a PPP social responsibility plan.
Today, it only seems logical that Public Private Partnerships, especially in the Caribbean and Central America, have at their core citizen acceptance and participation.
Particularly in divided societies and I don’t mean unstable societies. I mean countries that may have 2 or more strong established parties jockeying back and forth for power.
In such situations exploitative questions may arise over the use of natural resources by private and especially foreign companies.
Other questions could center on the extent to which some services should be freely available or provided at socialized prices.
In these situations or in cases involving perceptions of corruption, negative impacts to local people, or environmental problems,
it is not unusual to find local citizenry groups rising in protest against the PPP.
Of course local level strategies to improve credibility and the business environment exist in nearly all Caribbean and Central American countries and some governments have even created associations and institutions to discuss, evaluate and in some cases promote a more active participation of private sector companies.
This goes a long way in providing an environment suitable for PPPs.
So, for governments in this region to attract private partners there needs to be a clear agreement in the society about the private sector presence and role even before PPP’s are considered as an option.
Lets be honest, in some Caribbean and Central American countries the private sector is held in suspicion because of ideology, misinformation or bad experience.
For the last year we have been working with local private partners and the municipal government in a region of Venezuela to develop a project with regards to the coffee industry.
Problems within the government and attitudes pervasive in the local community have wreaked havoc on our plans and brought progress to a standstill.
But I’m not really focusing on this type of situation, but rather PPPs that are developed and negotiated ‘in the dark.’
These types of projects, especially in the region will face difficulties when public knowledge about contract provisions or unofficial deals emerge.
A survey in 2006 on the entire Latin America region showed that public perceptions on whether the contribution of privatization was positive dipped downward from 45% in 1998 to 31% in 2005.
PPPs developed in the dark eventual come to light and we know our people – this simply doesn’t fly.
It is my opinion that an integrated formalized exchange of information and experiences with community leaders is a key part of the process.
Likewise an active dissemination of information by national associations of municipalities, some international organizations, knowledge centers, governments and other agencies provides a basis for general understanding of and appreciation for PPP’s.
Independent, as well as government, monitoring and accountability measures that provide feedback to the citizenry can serve to keep the processes transparent and credible, and the PPP approach socially (and environmentally) acceptable over the long term.
Both local governments and the private partner can develop supportive partnerships with independent or professional agencies and academiacs to serve as consultants and trainers during learning cycle stages or to advice them on more complicated processes and activities.
Now, depending on the type of PPP project, the initiation could come from the government side or from a proposal presented to the government by a group often backed by a potential partner.
Regardless, once presented if the national government or municipality is interested it needs to, early on, designate a responsible team of officials and possible external advisors to initiate and manage the project processes.
Having experienced advisors can help save a significant amount of resources and help achieve the desired objectives of PPP projects.
Once the plan is laid out, the process to qualify potential partners has to be clear and relatively simple.
While a potential partner’s direct or indirect involvement may have existed during the pre-PPP opportunity announcement, experience and expertise of all interested private companies or consortia should be considered.
Additionally, governments should consider the record of the companies in handling social issues or environmental effects of their past projects.
Again, it is important that there is transparency in this process to ensure that, in society, there is general perception of fairness.
A well recognized, fair and transparent system of announcing and qualifying bids, their ranking and selection, processes of negotiation (if any), and system of awards has to be fully endorsed and supported by different agencies when possible.
This, too, is a critical issue in PPP acceptance and sustainability because it helps create a public perception that this process is done fairly and with public interest considered.
Now the last issue I’d like to touch on is the role of the private partner and its social and environmental responsibilities.
As we have seen throughout the Caribbean and Central America with regards to private industry, even certain “fair trade” eco-tourism type projects, the human and environmental exploitation can occur despite otherwise stated intentions.
National and municipal officials need to ensure there is full understanding of the various social and environmental impacts of projects, and that selection of partners, approaches and processes is made with all these factors considered.
But really the onus is on the private partner and its outlook on corporate social responsibility.
The theme of Corporate Social Responsibility continues to grow in importance in debates throughout the Americas.
Together with sustainable development and business ethics, it is also high on the public policy agenda. Although it is a less tangible issue than the conceptual idea of Public Private Partnerships, this issue has considerable importance for PPPs.
Now, when a private company incorporates voluntary social and environmental business practices into its core activities, which go beyond its existing legal obligations it, in essence is implementing a corporate social responsibility program.
But for many companies, adjusting existing corporate policies across the board can be rather difficult.
I believe PPPs especially in the Caribbean and Central America, offer private companies the opportunity to “selectively” apply social responsibility techniques from the ground up on a particular project – the PPP.
Of course the PPP would ensure a corporate responsibility plan for all private stakeholders inclusive of local subs and partners.
A PPP that adheres to the principles of CSR should be able to promote the well being of employees, contractors, the citizenry and the environment.
Issues often at the center of debates in the region.
Such a project is also advantageous to the government partner since sustainable buildings, low operating and maintenance costs and increasingly, multi-purpose premises, help to generate more national wealth.
The PPP plan should also address the occupational safety and job satisfaction of staff and provide them with opportunities for continuous improvement in skills.
Leading such a plan the private partner will see an investment return, since more skills and more satisfaction should imply more productive employees.
The regional importance of the environment is another key reason for a private partner to push for a socially responsible PPP thereby decreasing the environmental loads resulting from most PPP projects.
Additionally, intense efforts should be taken to reduce energy consumption, emissions and the amount of waste activities.
With the negative image of foreign private companies in many places in the Caribbean and Central America, all stakeholders (private and public) should be increasingly sensitive to a PPPs overall public image and reputation and recognize that social responsibility activities can be a positive component.
Also, it should be mentioned that investors (all else being equal) seem to be more likely to put their money into businesses which are able to demonstrate socially responsible behavior.
So briefly, in conclusion, Public Private Partnerships have incredible potential in extending the provision of public services in the Caribbean and Central America. There are various issues that need addressing and a key component is the inclusion and the attention directed towards the community in all stages of the project.
Thank you.